
Rating
|
Zopa
(3 year
market)
|
Zopa
(5 year
market)
|
Funding
Circle
(all markets)
|
A+
|
0.5%
|
0.4%
|
0.6%
|
A
|
1.0%
|
0.8%
|
1.5%
|
B
|
2.9%
|
2.3%
|
2.3%
|
C
|
5.2%
|
4.2%
|
3.3%
|
Y
|
5.0%
|
3.1%
|
n/a
|
As you can see even the A+ rated loans are risky compared to
the corporate bond ratings we looked at earlier. For example to get an expected
gross return of 7% in the 3 year market at Zopa you would need to charge 7.5%
in A+, 8% in A, 9.9% in B and 12.2% in the C market. On top of the default
rates you have to take into account the fees that the providers charge. Zopa
charges 0.5% and Funding Circle 1% a year.
Valuation methods
To evaluate the attractiveness in offering a loan we have to
take into account the default rate and also the providers fees. I've found that
the providers are a bit too optimistic with their default rates. Clearly it is
in their interests to do so. Borrowers get better rates to borrow at and
lenders are willing to lend at lowers rates meaning the providers can produce a
lot of business. Therefore I take their default rates with a pinch of salt. In
order to give us a margin of safety I double the default rate that the provider
gives. This gives us the following formula for our expected return:
R = I - 2D - F
Where: R = Expected rate of
return
I = Interest rate offered to
borrower
D = Estimated default rate
F = Providers fee
Using this method we can evaluate the current market
conditions (note the figures below show the maximum accepted rate for the last
5 completed loans. This figures tend to be volatile and rates higher than these
get accepted if you are patient)
Zopa
(3 year
market)
|
Rate to
borrower
|
Default
|
2*Default
|
Fee
|
Net Expected
Return
|
A+
|
6.5%
|
0.5%
|
1.0%
|
0.5%
|
5.0%
|
A
|
6.7%
|
1.0%
|
2.0%
|
0.5%
|
4.2%
|
B
|
7.9%
|
2.9%
|
5.8%
|
0.5%
|
1.6%
|
C
|
8.8%
|
5.2%
|
10.4%
|
0.5%
|
-2.1%
|
Y
|
8.0%
|
5.0%
|
10.0%
|
0.5%
|
-2.5%
|
Zopa
(5 year
market)
|
Rate to
borrower
|
Default
|
2*Default
|
Fee
|
Net Expected
Return
|
A+
|
8.2%
|
0.4%
|
0.8%
|
0.5%
|
6.9%
|
A
|
8.7%
|
0.8%
|
1.6%
|
0.5%
|
6.6%
|
B
|
10.0%
|
2.3%
|
4.6%
|
0.5%
|
4.9%
|
C
|
11.6%
|
4.2%
|
8.4%
|
0.5%
|
2.7%
|
Y
|
8.0%
|
3.1%
|
6.2%
|
0.5%
|
1.3%
|
Funding
Circle
(all markets)
|
Rate to
borrower
|
Default
|
2*Default
|
Fee
|
Net Expected
Return
|
A+
|
7.5%
|
0.6%
|
1.2%
|
1.0%
|
5.3%
|
A
|
9.0%
|
1.5%
|
3.0%
|
1.0%
|
5.0%
|
B
|
9.4%
|
2.3%
|
4.6%
|
1.0%
|
3.8%
|
C
|
9.2%
|
3.3%
|
6.6%
|
1.0%
|
1.6%
|
As you can see the expected rates currently on offer are
quite low. The best rates are in the 5 year Zopa markets where 6.9% is
currently available in the A+ market. As I said before these rates are volatile
and change daily. Expected returns of over 8% in the Zopa markets are not
uncommon if you are patient. Looking back at historical accepted loans at
Funding Circle loans at 12.2% (and higher) to the borrower have been made in
the A+ market, giving an estimated net return of 10.0% plus.
Dangers
Clearly the main danger is in the risk of default of the
borrower, meaning the person you lend the money to doesn't pay you back.
Defaults aren't as rare as you might imagine either. Expect to get them as a
normal part of this type of investing. To minimize our risks we use default
rates above what the providers insurance underwriters estimate. This gives us a
margin of safety. If their default rates are correct then we will make more
profit than we anticipated and if they are wrong then we have a layer of
protection in our larger default estimates to shield us from making a bad
investment. It is by no means a safe investment to make and using the about we
at least minimize the risk to our capital. Another method is to simply
diversify. At Zopa the minimum loan contract is £10 and at Funding Circle £20.
Therefore if any loan does default it will usually only be a small proportion
of our total loan book. If you want you could lend all your money to one
customer, although I would advise against putting all your egg in one basket.
Another area of risk is inflation. In times of high
inflation the real value of your loan is decreasing all the time. Provided we
have a diversified portfolio and the expected returns on any fixed income
investments (bonds and peer-to-peer lending) is high then we shouldn't need to
be too concerned about the effects of inflation on our investments.
There will be times when your money is earning no return
when it is waiting to be lent out at your desired rate. I find it's usually
better to be patient and wait a few months to lock in a good return than be in
a rush to lend out all your money at potentially unfavourable rates. Both providers will
let you set up an auto relend facility whereby you set the rates you are
willing to lend at in each market and they will automatically relend money you
receive as payments from existing borrowers. Both of these providers let you
sell your loan book should you want to cash in the money early too.
You cannot deduct bad debt before tax.
ReplyDeleteSo lending at 8% with .5% bad debt and 1% fee nets down to 6.5%. But you pay tax on 7% (you can deduct fees against tax), 1.4%, 2.8% for 20% and 40% taxpayers. So post tax returns in this case are 5.1% and 3.7%. Even worse for higher risk markets
I would add that while the interest is taxable, losses due to defaults do not count against the interest.
ReplyDeleteThis makes the lower quality loans even less profitable.
I do think that a 2x margin of safety is excessive though! How about 1.5%? Now the post tax return should be:
R = (I - F)*T - 1.5D
Where T is 0.8 or 0.6 or possibly 0.5, depending on your circumstances.